- MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES HOW TO
- MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES UPDATE
- MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES TRIAL
Hankey simply does not know the contents of the book.
MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES TRIAL
Table 1: Hunt's Trial Main Point of Rush to Judgment Which is ludicrous as it is hardly the book's topic. Hankey's excuse will be there is some mention of the Hunt case in a new edition of Rush to Judgement. Everyone knows Rush to Judgement was based off Lane's posthumous defense brief for Oswald. What I do not understand is he actually wrote this down and has included a photo of the reprinted 1992 version. If he had said this in an interview, I could understand we all make mistakes live.
The book he is discussing is not Rush to Judgment, It's actually Plausible Denial. With this background - with this framework to guide the researcher-it was then possible to assemble the evidence linking Bush to Hunt." Howard Hunt, a major lieutenant in the CIA's "misguided anti-Castro Cuban" program, was in Dallas and involved in the assassination. "But then Mark Lane, in Rush to Judgment, did the fabulous work of demonstrating, and in fact persuading a jury, that E. He is still misappropriating Mark Lane's work badly, so badly he now believes Lane's Rush to Judgement was the book that mentioned the Hunt and Bush connection. To list all of the stuff he has changed since we began tracking him closely back in January 2010, is just plain boring. Nevertheless, the person who discovered it has recently challenged Hankey's interpretation of the document.īefore I get to that tasty morsel, let us explore some new Hankeyian standards.įirst, perhaps in reaction to CTKA, he has dropped many of his bogus angles. These properties have elevated GHWB into the realms of Kennedy assassination kingpin. John Hankey's central illusion revolves around a certain FBI memo which, according to him, contains mystical properties. Furthermore, the reader will see Fetzer asked Jim to call me off in the very fight that he started, with his silly article. You will note that Mr Fetzer could not reply to any of my questions concerning his own argument against me. My reply to Mr Fetzer's lame critique is linked above. Hankey co-authored the piece with Fetzer. The first article "Was George Bush Involved in the Assassination of JFK?" was a belated reply to the Bush articles we have posted here. At last count, he has at least five articles defending the honor of numerous jokers we have attacked. So much so, he writes about us much at Veteran's Today. And almost anything we criticize Fetzer seems to admire e.g. Fetzer, Hankey's Ally against CTKA OppressionĬTKA, essentially set Fetzer's JFK agenda in all of this Hankey imbroglio. Part III discusses his interpretation of the Zhou En-Lai assassination attempt and his delusions concerning Prescott Bush, whom according to Hankey, was the real power behind the CIA. In Part II, to celebrate the 50th last year he debated a tape recording of Jim DiEugenio and still lost the argument. We discuss his new positions and get feedback from Joseph McBride. In Part I, we learn he has teamed up with Jim Fetzer and written a spectacularly ridiculous article on the silly "Veterans Today" site. There are another three new additions (including this) I shall link to later.
MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES UPDATE
Fetzer's silly articles.ĭiEugenio's Review Update of "Dark Legacy"Ĭoogan Reply to Fetzer at Deep Politics Forum Here are the three Hankey related articles and a reply to one of Mr. But it ended up as a three-part essay discussing the latest hilarious installments in Hankey's (and Jim Fetzer's) career. This present essay was going to be short piece.
MALCOLM WALLACE SKULL AND BONES HOW TO
Considering how bizarre Hankey's work has been of late, I really don't know how to interpret that. One thing I do know is that Hankey hates being associated with Jim, CTKA, and myself. I personally prefer that people discuss my article on James Bamford, or JFK and the MJ-12 hoax. Since then my name and CTKA's have been nearly synonymous with John Hankey. Jim DiEugenio and I had no idea what we would kick up when I wrote my first article for CTKA.
0 kommentar(er)
